Collective reciprocity emerges from this pattern of conditional strategy of reciprocation and helps form a structure that guides the very interactions that give birth to the structure. We postulate that individual users of social Q&A constantly adjust their kindness in the direction of the observed benefit and effort of others. Taking a structuration perspective and integrating reciprocity research in economics, this study examines the dynamics of reciprocal interactions in social question & answer communities.

Together, these findings suggest a paradox in which divergence from community norms, as indicated by vote score patterns, have emotional consequences and attention rewards. Findings also show that downvoted content receives higher levels of engagement than upvoted content. This is the first systematic test of how ratings influence emotional expression on a social media platform. Analysing data from the platform's three most popular subreddits, we ask: How do rating features afford emotional expression and content engagement? Findings from a Variable-Lag Granger Causality model show that for a portion of Reddit users (14.5%), vote scores predict subsequent emotional expression, with upvotes preceding positive sentiments and downvotes preceding negative sentiments. Vote scores indicate convergence with, and divergence from, community norms. Reddit is a social news site on which users in topic-based communities (subreddits) create posts upon which others upvote, downvote, and comment. This paper addresses the social effects of content ratings through a case study of Reddit. Rating features on social media platforms affect visibility algorithms and act as symbolic markers of evaluation. It analyses particular cases of Karmawhoring, user criticisms of such merely achievement-oriented contributions as well as attempts to counteract these tendencies. By looking at participatory practices and users’ interplay, it investigates opposing justifications and controversial incentives for contributions. This paper examines how such a quantification of user participation influences interactions and content posted on Reddit. The term references Reddit’s ranking and evaluation system through the allocation of Karma-points. The latter approach has been called ‘Karmawhoring’. While some users emphasise topically focused motivations for their participation, others suggest that they mainly post content with the aim of collecting ‘Karma-points’. However, one can observe internal conflicts which indicate discrepancies between such idealistic claims as opposed to quantitatively-oriented participation.

The social news aggregator claims to be ‘a website about everything, powered by community, democracy and you’. In Reddit’s numerous topical subsections, so called subreddits, users post and share diverse content.

The shadow work journal pdf reddit